Renoise Forums: The ugly multitimbral issue - revisited - Renoise Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

The ugly multitimbral issue - revisited Kontakt Sound Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Foreign Presence 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Normal Members
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: 30-October 02

Posted 06 November 2002 - 07:11 AM

Hi:

I'm wondering whether in the short or long term the developers ever plan to re-add support for multitimbral instruments. If the answer is no then I'm curious as to how hard it would be for Renoise to develop an internal sound engine comparable to Kontakt.

(No tracker I've heard so far comes even close to Kontakt's sound quality, even without using the effects like Saturation etc. I don't know what NI has done different but the sound output is excellent, whereas most trackers sound flat (even with the sinc interpolation rendering) and need a lot of EQ work to sound like hardware-generated music)

Just curious what the developers' word is on this issue
user posted image
0

#2 User is offline   alx 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Normal Members
  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 06 November 2002 - 09:52 AM

Hi,

I had the same question, but i guess we have it already! (god, Renoise is so great! :D )

For me, multitimbral is done with different tracks : if you want to play a piano with a string and apply different effects to each samples, you can do this with tracks, no? Even if it's not a single instrument, you can simulate it.

The overall sound quality has nothing to do with the tracker : it depends mainly on the quality of the sample and the effects already applied in the sample by the "hardware-generated-sample" (ok, this is not completly true, because we still need to use Renoise DSP or VST effects to get a much better sound, so the quality depends on those post-effects too)

________

Alx
0

#3 User is offline   TB303Man 

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Normal Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 06 November 2002 - 12:43 PM

Yes, but the Kontakt price is "only" 400 euros.
:o
0

#4 User is offline   Foreign Presence 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Normal Members
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: 30-October 02

Posted 06 November 2002 - 04:43 PM

For the record I've tried running the same sounds through trackers then through Kontakt and there are definite differences. Yes, Kontakt costs a lot of money, and renoise doesn't .... but by the descriptions of trackers today you'd think there wouldn't be that much difference in sound quality. But there is. Maybe a thread on how to get that "professional" sound out of Renoise needs to be started. I'd say Renoise's output is clean but needs a lot of processing to sound lively (Kontakt's needs next to none).

But anyway the question was about VSTi's and what the developers plan to do about it. Or will things remain as they are?

BTW, outside of this issue, Renoise is phenomenal!

FP
user posted image
0

#5 User is offline   martinal 

  • Renoise Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Normal Members
  • Posts: 1158
  • Joined: 03-October 02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 November 2002 - 12:12 AM

Quote

I'd say Renoise's output is clean but needs a lot of processing to sound lively (Kontakt's needs next to none).


Can I guess this is because Kontakt _does_ a lot of processing?
A 400$ softsynth probably has quite advanced algorithms.

Quote

But anyway the question was about VSTi's and what the developers plan to do about it.  Or will things remain as they are?


This is not fixed in 1.2. IMO it would be a good idea to make this possible later. But which features will be done for later versions is yet to be decided.
<span style='color:blue'><span style='font-family:Optima'><b>martin</b> at <i>renoise.com</i></span></span>
0

#6 User is online   taktik 

  • renoise developer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admins
  • Posts: 11045
  • Joined: 03-October 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Berlin, Germany
  • Interests:füße waschen

Posted 07 November 2002 - 12:17 AM

well, at least you have the possibility to use unlimited no of insert and sendeffects for mastering in renoise. this way you decide for yourself what your sounds need to have to sound more like you want to hear them ...
0

#7 Guest_Sunjammer_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 08 November 2002 - 10:55 AM

Renoise is better than anything else out there. No, im right. No no no stop arguing. Youre wrong i'm right. Renoise is better. Its not only better, it stomps on all competition.

This coming from years of production experience. Renoise simply works. If you cant do what you want in renoise, youre simply not good enough yet. The tracker as a concept was never intended to be stand-alone, to be independent. Its a sequencer, not a synth. Whatever samples you get you get from other sources. From a pure tracker point of view, it doesnt really get much better than this, and the price isnt just managable, it feels good to pay for something that works this well.

Do sounds externally, do tracking in renoise. How hard a concept is that to get?

Cheers,

- Andreas SJ :drummer:

#8 Guest_Guest_Foreign Presence_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 November 2002 - 06:55 PM

That was all very interesting, but nobody was talking about Renoise's status as a pure tracker (except for when I said "outside of this issue, Renoise is phenomenal"). Did you even read what I wrote? This thread is about sound OUTPUT, not samples or tracker features or anything else. By your logic there is no problem with most trackers staying with the perfectly stable FastTracker, and people have been complaining about that mixing engine for years.

Taktik, I will look into what effects work best. Thanks.

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply